Protect the press and freedom of speech ..

Al Bano e Romina Power - Liberta OFFICIAL VIDEO VERY RARE !!

Law change to protect the press and freedoms of speech .. 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/12/03/laws-could-changed-protect-press-freedoms-following-meghan-duchess/

My opinion https://tinyurl.com/eta8a96h following by links / news of the same nature:

There is not need to protect the public with new laws from invasiveness of the press, because anyone can reach the same for any matters that concern our world and as a result, receive a payment to publish contrary of the monarchy, that relay heavy from the UK public purse, tax payer and contributor of their own expenses, life and luxury in which demand to live, complete opposite of peoples that swam in debt, poverty, unemployment, food banks, homeless, etc.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=388911475970229&set=ecnf.100045541406705

The Sussex's legal victory, may thanks to Prince Charles legal team (Similar to Meghan’s current action, Charles sued for breach of copyright and confidentiality:  https://uk.news.yahoo.com/royal-family-members-taking-legal-action-in-court-143059681.html   "And so, there is nothing wrong within the Royal Family against each other", as they like to portrait with Oprah Winfrey's interview and Ellen DeGeneres chat show, but well connected, passing tips into each other and even legal team to win legal cases! ) and the UK tax payer that foot ( https://duchyofcornwall.org/ ) the bill!

https://www.facebook.com/rosariocastellanosdeparker1960/photos/a.380705482096360/1903318619835031

The news read: "This is a victory not just for me, but for anyone who has ever felt scared to stand up for what is right, Meghan Markle" and that is not true, "we are not scare, but full aware of the UK law, which way it goes and who wins the case by contest in a court of law", which is different one to another by whoever is your friend, got the right influence, right connections and the cash - ruled by inequality (as the letter was sent to Mr Markle, his belong, property and entitle to do anything he wants with it!  - BUT the rule:  In their decision, the three judges said the letter's contents were "personal, private and not matters of legitimate public interest"-  And that is not for the Judges to contest, but the owner of the letter, Mr Markle   https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59502787  ), uncontested (as the refusal to sit the Duchess for a full hearing:  In February, the High Court had ruled against the newspaper group on the issue of privacy and copyright - saying the issues in the case were so clear cut that there was no need for a full hearing.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59502787 ), Impartial (impartial is not directly involved in a particular situation, and is therefore able to give a fair opinion or decision about it.) and ruled by privileged favouritism!  https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=385802746281102&set=ecnf.100045541406705

The letter was send to the Duchess father and as such in law, belongs to Mr Markle to do anything he wants, even in a court of law, mean in a real legal matter away from favouritism, "because in reality who will go against own father (?)" unless want notoriety (riches, fame, glory, etc!) using Mr Markle for any reasons (fortune, fame, etc), when Slavery (use a human person for profits and gains) is a crime in law since the Victorians times, knowing full well her own dad got no the right connections, money to contest and elderly, taking full advantage! https://www.facebook.com/243201285846781/photos/pb.100045541406705.-2207520000../1802175489949345/?type=3

You complaint about the Queen, Prince Charles and the Royal Family, but nobody speak about Mr Markle, wonder where is the equality in the UK / US / Worldwide!-

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1495545/prince-harry-news-latest-queen-prince-philip-bbc-documentary-royal-family

And I notice that, when I write anything to give my opinion, as you can read previous notes in my internet social places, FB page and blog somehow the next day, Sussex Royals wins anything, any contest and any matter, anytime, using me like Mr Markle without my permit, consent, knowledge for own purposes and gains, as if I am their own Slave which is a crime in law, even for breach of copyright and confidentiality, acting myself exactly like Prince Charles and sued them for millions and according to the Duchess own words: "This is a victory not just for me, but for anyone who has ever felt scared to stand up for what is right, Meghan Markle," and I want to see if this is the true, for my own cause, case and purposes, using us with the excuse of "family problems" when is their own "family and their own problems", never me and mine (children) to be dragged into, instead of Prince Charles and his own children full responsibility! - 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/royal-family-members-taking-legal-action-in-court-143059681.html 

It is time to tackle the reputation and integrity of anyone not matter which level of life, grade, style, riches and stamp abuse, violence, supremacy, etc! - NEVER AGAIN! -

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=387663576095019&set=a.329902938537750

I protect me and my children with the law, any law worldwide, including the magna carta, rule of law and canon law, that my lord is my witness, so help me god and so be it in law, Rosario Castellanos de Parker.  https://www.facebook.com/rosario.parker1

POLITE REQUEST THIS NOTE IS FREE BUT PROTECTED WITH COPY RIGHTS. ESTA NOTA ES GRATUITA, PROHIBÍDO SU REPRODUCCIÓN Ó DISTRIBUICIÓN, RENTADA Ó IMPORTADA CON INTERESES EDUCATIVOS, POLITÍCOS Ó ECONOMICOS, USANDO PALABRAS SIMILARES Ó PARCIALES, BAJO LA PROTECCIÓN DE LA ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL, DE LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL (OMPI) SIN ANTES OBTENER PERMISO DE ROSARIO CASTELLANOS RUIZ.. Mayo2010. http://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/909/wipo_pub_909.html#reprod